Loading...

Translation of ICT for Education towards a Knowledge Society

©2015 Academic Paper 250 Pages

Summary

The growing importance of knowledge, research, innovation and evolving perspectives on expertise with the usage of Information Communication Technologies (ICT) are changing the sociology of knowledge in the globalized world. Universities are the major institutions involved in the production and dissemination of knowledge. This book looks at ICT for education initiatives taken up towards building a Knowledge Society as emphasized in national education policy regimes for encouraging knowledge generation, knowledge acquisition, knowledge diffusion and the exploitation of knowledge. The research examines the present practice of ICT adoption in an existing framework of University of Hyderabad (UOH) and Tezpur University (TZU) through intensive case study. The research attempts to analyze issues of knowledge, governance and access using ICT; the application of communication technologies in Higher Education Sector that helps in fulfilling the goal of a Knowledge Society; the communication process and strategies in the networking of higher education into a Knowledge Society; existing ‘digital divide’ and the implications. The Stakeholder’s perspective further highlights the advantages and the challenges faced in the actual implementation of ICT4E. Based on the study, the research offers recommendations for management, human resources, processes and institutional culture in ICT4E implementation.

Excerpt

Table Of Contents



5
Chapter 1
Introduction
Defining Information and Communication Technology
"Information Technology (IT) is originally a technology of storing and retrieving
knowledge or data ­ i.e., on computers. Communication technology (CT) is a technology
of both/either `as a process [or transmission], by which A sends a message [data] to B
upon whom it has an effect' and/or `as a negotiation and exchange of meaning', which is
widely known or separately evolved as broadcasting or mass communications and
telecommunications. The very critical technology to realize such a convergence is the
advent of Internet, which enables to transmit, record, store, retrieve knowledge, data,
images (e.g., broadcasting) and even voice (e.g., telecommunication), particularly
worldwide on an instant or real- time base as two-way communications for both a one-to-
one and one-to- multiple" (Kim 2002, p1).
Asabere and Enguah (2012) define ICT as the tools, facilities, processes, and
equipment that provide the required environment with the physical infrastructure and the
services for the generation, transmission, processing, storing and disseminating of
information in all forms including voice, text, data, graphics and video. The Association
of African Universities (2000,p3) defines ICT as "a shorthand for the computers, software,
networks, satellite links and related systems that allow people to access, analyse, create,
exchange and use data, information and knowledge in ways that, until recently, were
almost unimaginable. It refers to the infrastructure that brings people together in different
places and time zones, with multimedia tools for data, information, and knowledge
management in order to expand the range of human capabilities." The definition of ICT for
the purpose of this thesis will focus mainly on computer and internet based technologies; it
will also include television and satellite technology like EDUSAT. Lim and Chai, (2004)
talk about ICT as a tool in the process of education in the following ways:
1. Informative tool: It provides vast amount of data in various formats
such as audio, video, documents.
2. Situating tool: It creates situations, which the student experiences in
real life. Thus, simulation and virtual reality is possible.
3. Constructive tool: To manipulate the data and generate analysis.

6
4. Communicative tool: It can be used to remove communication barriers
such as that of space and time.
Socio-economic, cultural, time and geographical barriers are main challenges faced in
pursuing higher education (Bhattacharya and Sharma, 2007). Innovative use of ICT can
help in filling this chasm. Economy and social development of a country depends a lot on
its education sector. ICT has the potential to boost the education sector of a country by
providing cost effective, quality education by overcoming human resources; time and
distance barriers. ICT enables sharing of best practices and best course content in related
fields which can enhance pedagogy. It allows universities to reach disadvantaged groups
and new international educational markets. Some believe that democratization of education
can be achieved by ICT enhanced education which calls for skilled labor force (McGorry,
2002; Cholin, 2005; Mehta and Kalra, 2006; Agarwal, 2006 and Sinko, 2011). In
developing countries like India, education is regarded as an important bridge of social,
economic and political mobility (Amutabi and Oketch, 2003; UNESCO, 2011).
In the present Knowledge society, the concept of lifelong learners has developed as
the shelf life of information has reduced. ICT gives access to latest knowledge and
information (Plomp, Pelgrum & Law, 2007; Butcher, 2010 and Shan Fu, 2013). Education
in the long run increases the productive skills and earning power of a person (Kozma,
2005). ICT used in education, such as teleconferencing, email, audio conferencing,
television lessons, radio broadcasts, interactive radio counseling, interactive voice
response system, audiocassettes and CD ROMs etc can facilitate learning in this context
(Sanyal, 2001; Bhattacharya and Sharma, 2007; Castro Sánchez and Alemán, 2011; Shan
Fu, 2013). ICT becoming techno-centric, emphasizing on production and creation of
knowledge and not on people who use it; ICT leading to centralized decision-making;
acting as a political tool, strengthening the existing power balance are the debates
surrounding the use of ICT. Van der Velden (2002) talks of ICT becoming a tool of
oppression as it can increase inequalities between people owing to differences in socio-
economic impact in use of ICT. He further criticizes the policies stating that
"ICT-based knowledge systems in a development setting are often non-responsive:
not designed for or adapted to the specific information and communication needs
of users; and inflexible: static and centralized systems that do not support the
creative and democratic needs of users. These ICT applications and solutions are
biased towards the transfer of existing knowledge, for example the so-called best

7
practices and lessons learned from other countries and situations, over the creation
of new knowledge. Secondly, they favour the management of explicit knowledge,
the information that fits databases, forms and other formats used to manage
knowledge".
Another view point sates the role of ICT in a knowledge management culture as mainly
that of capturing, re-using, and distributing existing knowledge. Cultivating knowledge by
creating new, profitable knowledge is a costly proposition and, not affordable for most
developing countries because of the huge amount of financial and educational investment
needed. As such some fear that knowledge society based on the commoditization of
knowledge may thus well be a scenario in which developing countries restructure their
economies to adapt to the needs of `western' knowledge economies, becoming more
dependent on `western' scientific and technical knowledge.
The conceptualization of knowledge as commodity however is a limited and limiting
perspective.
The concept of Knowledge Society and ICT in Higher Education
Robert E. Lane (1966) coined the term `knowledgeable society' a society having its roots
in epistemology and the logic of inquiry. Knorr-Cetina (1999) states that "it is a society
permeated with knowledge cultures, the whole set of structures and mechanisms that serve
knowledge and unfold with its articulation". Knowledge industries are recognized in the
field of education, research and development, communication media, information
machines and services. Butcher (2010) states that ICT is the pillar that will lead education
and innovation dynamics towards the Knowledge Society. Clark (1983) maintained that
social dynamics in higher education is dependent on the expansion of knowledge. Hooker
(2010) and Tapper (2010) consider that a Knowledge based society is dependent on
Information and Communication Technology (ICT), Education, Training and Innovation.
Growth of research based knowledge in higher education institution is creating a situation
where this development changes the social dynamics of the higher education institutions,
national systems of higher education and relationships between national higher education
systems. This growth is taking place simultaneously with the development of modern
knowledge societies. Castells and Himanen (2002) mentioned that the knowledge society

8
is organized in and through networks. According to them, successful companies use
networking as a model to organize their industrial production, research and development
activities and cooperation with other partners (including universities). They assert that
networks illuminate the way power is organized in general. The role of higher education in
this context is seen crucial in the development of global information societies.
Various debates in academic fields and policy related documents give interesting
arguments in this regard. It has been noticed that there is a shift from the linear models of
communication (sender ­ message ­ channel ­ recipient) towards more collective and
reciprocal approach. It is no longer a hierarchical `sender' to `recipient' order, but rather
there is role reversal in the communication process and both add to the content and
meaning of the message. In ICT enabled communication process, the message does not
remain fixed, but changes as it flows among different actors as each comprehend and
respond to the message in different ways. This shift in communication loop in the
Information network is an indicator for the research/policy link. A message may be picked
up or missed by actors depending on how each actor relates to it. "Although most ideas in
the information age are communicated in written form, often electronically, the
interpersonal aspect of communication is still extremely important. Even electronic
communication is based on the notion of interpersonal relations. The research/policy link
is in the advantageous position of being able to draw on both micro and macro
perspectives of interpersonal communication and advocacy, as its field ranges from
individual output and opinions to macro concerns for the distribution of ideas, power and
resources on a global level" (cf. Hudson, in Lewis and Wallace, 2000).
Communication and knowledge transfer systems are ingrained in cultural and social
context, and technology is `translated' in different ways between contexts (McMaster et
al., 1997 on actor network theory). This implies that the cultural and social associations
will influence the way ICT are understood and accepted (Peterson, 1998). In turn, this has
measureable effects on the way policies are translated. Higher education policies "for the
knowledge society" at work in the institutional level needs to look into:
·
How individual higher education institutions participate in the discourse
about the knowledge society.
·
The dialogue with the State, external "stakeholders" and peers.

9
·
Development of internal institutional policies in connection with the
knowledge society talk. The impact on curriculum, research and outreach.
·
The entrepreneurial or academic enterprising university
·
Universities as actors in knowledge regions
Valcke (2003) recommends the following lists of `ways forward' to promote the integrated
use of ICT in higher education based on a critical policy analysis of the Flemish context.
He distinguishes between macro-level issues, pertaining to the regional, national and
international of individual educational institutes and meso-level issues that focus on intra-
institutional elements.
Macro-level
· Foster collaboration between institutes
· `Seed money' is crucial to start up innovations in higher education
· Accompanying measures should also be supported, and this to a very
large extent. The latter is especially true for support actions such as
dissemination, expertise exchange;
· conditions that promote collaboration between institutes, between
Higher professional education and universities, the application of
industry standards;
· staff training as an integral part of projects;
· Involve the existing umbrella organisations to promote the ICT based
innovations;
· Start up and promote national evaluation and monitoring activities;
· Redefine innovation project tenders that pursue Educational innovation
based on ICT;
· Define internal and external quality assurance cycles.
Meso-level
· Define an educational policy and related ICT policy;
· Foster collaboration within the higher education institute (between
faculties/departments);
· Focus on initiatives that are scalable;
· Extrapolate the administrative, logistics, technical consequences of ICT
projects. This implies that the projects should start as early as possible

10
to negotiate with departments that `own' crucial information about
students, staff data, rosters, calendars, ...
· Set up an internal quality control cycle;
· Foster collaboration with other higher education institutes; e.g., in the
context of `associations';
· Invest in a significant way in central support (helpdesk, training,
documentation, registration, authentication ...);
· Discuss and determine the consequences of educational ICT use for the
human resource management: incentives for staff, staff development,
specialisation, new job profiles, etc.
Wolf (2001), Drori et al. (2003), Butcher (2010) and Etzkowitz et.al (2012) identify
Universities as the main players in the knowledge society as they generate and diffuse
knowledge. They supply human capital for the economies that are ever more dependent on
knowledge. Universities need to coordinate with knowledge intensive industries. National
policies for encouraging knowledge generation, knowledge acquisition, knowledge
diffusion, and the exploitation of knowledge have become the most pressing priorities in
the science, research and education policy regimes. The task before higher education
researchers regarding the knowledge society is the critical evaluation of a situation in
which our methodological gaze has become as meaningful when turned inward--to higher
education itself--as when we purport to study contexts and phenomena outside our walls
(Bourdieu, 2004; Schwalje, 2011 and Etzkowitz et.al 2012).
Indian Scenario
Satellite in education started as Satellite Instructional Television Experiment (SITE) in
1975-76 in India. EDUSAT brought satellite connectivity to large parts of rural India. The
first steps in India for utilizing ICT potential towards promotion of education and research
in the country was through ERNET- a Society under the Ministry of IT&C in the
Department of Information Technology. The Tenth five year Plan of India emphasized the
use of ICTs to bring about a transformation of higher education sector to increase its
relevance and develop closer links with the job sector and to increase the quality of
teaching, research, business and community extension functions including life- long
learning. These visions and policies were further implemented in the Eleventh Five Year

11
Plan with an allocation of Rs.5000 crores for providing ICT infrastructure. 11th Plan
proposed that "Consortium for Educational Communication Centre (CEC) will set up a
technology enabled system of mass higher education by taking advantage of Vyas 24-
hours Education Channel for one way communication, EDUSAT network for two-way
communication and Internet for `any time anywhere' education. The thrust areas will
include strengthening of the existing media centres, setting up of new media centres in
those States where no centres exist, strengthening of the concepts of packaging knowledge
in video and e-content form in need-based subject areas, transforming the CEC and media
centre into a virtual university system" (11th FYP, 2008).
The National Knowledge Commission (NKC) focused on five key areas of enhancing
access to knowledge, reinvigorating institutions where knowledge concepts are imparted,
creating a world class environment for creation of knowledge, promoting applications of
knowledge for sustained and inclusive growth and using knowledge applications in
efficient delivery of public services. NKC a high-level advisory body to the Prime Minister
of India had the objective of transforming India into a knowledge society. In its endeavor
to transform the knowledge landscape of the country, the National Knowledge
Commission submitted around 300 recommendations on 27 focus areas during its three
and a half year term. While the term of the NKC has come to an end, the implementation
of NKC's recommendations is currently underway at the Central and State levels. (National
Knowledge Commission, 2008) NKC has five focus areas:
1.
Access ­ easy access to knowledge
2.
Concepts ­ all levels and forms of education
3.
Creation ­ effective creation of knowledge
4.
Application ­ of knowledge systems
5.
Services ­ for better delivery.
In Higher Education, National Knowledge Commission (NKC) has focused on the three
crucial aspects of expansion, excellence and inclusion. Expand capacity by establishing
new universities and lowering entry barriers for setting up the same - Attain a gross
enrolment ratio of at least 15 per cent by 2015.
NKC Impact - follow up on NKC recommendations: The final Report of NKC
(2009) contains the recommendations submitted by the Commission.

12
1.
Higher and technical education: To expand capacity and improve quality of higher
education, the Government has sanctioned the setting up of 15 new Central
Universities and 14 new Universities based on world-class standards. The
Government is in the process of setting up eight Indian Institutes of Technology
(IITs), 10 National Institutes of Technology (NIT), 20 Indian Institutes of
Information Technology (IIITs) as far as possible in the Public-Private Partnership
mode, three Indian Institutes of Science Education and Research (IISERs), seven
Indian Institutes of Management (IIMs) and two Schools of Planning and
Architecture (SPA). The Committee for Rejuvenation and Renovation of Higher
Education has been set up for the review of UGC/AICTE. The Science and
Engineering Research Board Bill 2008 has been introduced in the Parliament. The
National Mission on Education through Information and Communication
Technology (ICT) has been launched to leverage the potential of ICT in the
teaching learning process with an aim to enhance the GER in Higher Education by
5 percentage points by the end of the XI Plan. Under this Mission 20,000
institutions of Higher Education and nearly 10,000 University Departments will be
provided connectivity, beginning with a minimum of 5 Mbps for each one of them.
The Central Government will bear 75 per cent of the connectivity charges for 5
years, even for institutions not belonging to it. The estimated cost of the Mission is
Rs. 4612 crore.
2.
Integrated national knowledge network: During 2008-09 Rs. 100 crore has been
allocated for the National Knowledge Network (NKN) which proposes
interconnecting all knowledge institutions in the country with gigabit capabilities,
for sharing resources and research.
3.
Translation: The Government has approved the setting up of a National
Translation Mission (NTM) with an outlay of Rs. 75 crore.
4.
Libraries: Based on the recommendations of NKC, the Department of Culture
(DoC) proposed setting up a National Mission for Libraries (NML) in the XI Plan
as a Central Sector Scheme. The NML will cover libraries under the DoC and the
activities under it will include: National Census of Libraries; Modernization
including networking of Libraries under DoC; establishing Knowledge Centres
and Digital Libraries.
5.
Intellectual Property Rights: The IP Office has put the relevant acts, rules, manuals
on its website and there is no restriction on access to these materials. Digitization

13
of all patent records is underway. Forty-five thousand patent records are already
on the website. An IP Appellate Board has been set up for trademarks,
geographical indications and patents. DIPP is examining the issue of sui-generic
legislation for protection of traditional knowledge. Process is underway to
revitalize and reform polytechnics through industry linkage and teacher
development, establish 210community colleges and 700 polytechnics; and to
strengthen Open Universities and reform statutory bodies; scale up SAKSHAT as
the education portal for 50 crore people.
The National Knowledge Network (NKN) aspires to interconnect all universities, all
technical institutions, all medical institutions, all agricultural institutions, all related
Research and Development institutions, all libraries and all Universities for optimal
utilization of resources to give a major push to research and spread of quality education. A
budget allocation of Rs. 502 crores was made in 2008-09 for the National Mission on
Education through ICT. The attempt is to pool all teachers and experts in the country to
bring their collective wisdom for the benefit of every Indian learner and, thereby, reducing
the digital divide. Under this Mission, a proper balance between content generation,
research in critical areas relating to imparting of education and connectivity for integrating
our knowledge with the advancements in other countries is to be attempted. The NKN
comprises of an ultra-high speed CORE (multiples of 10 Gbps), complimented with a
distribution layer at appropriate speeds. Participating institutions at the Edge will connect
to NKN seamlessly at speeds of 1 Gbps or higher. Advanced applications in areas such as
Health, Education, Science and Technology, Grid Computing, Bio informatics,
Agriculture, and Governance will be an integral part of NKN. The entire network will
seamlessly integrate with the global scientific community at multiple gigabits per second
speed. Some of the salient features of the NKN are:
· Establishing Connectivity for Knowledge and information sharing.
· Enabling Collaborative Research in emerging areas such as Climate
Modelling.
· Facilitating distance education in specialized fields such as medicine,
emerging high tech areas covering info-bio-nano technology.
· Facilitating an ultra high speed e-governance backbone for information
sharing.

14
Another initiative, National Programme on Technology Enhanced Learning (NPTEL) is a
Ministry of Human Resource Development (MHRD) initiative to promote quality
engineering education in the country through video and web based learning material. The
seven Indian Institute of Technology (IITs) and Indian Institute of Science (IISc)
Bangalore had been entrusted to produce web-based and video based courses in 5
disciplines of Engineering (Civil/ Mechanical/ Electrical/ Electronics and Communication/
Computer Science and Engineering) as well as in Sciences, Humanities and Social
Sciences, Management areas. A total of 120 web-based courses and 115 video-based have
been produced in these disciplines in the first phase of the project. These courses are being
used as supplementary material, and also for training teachers in any institution. The broad
aim of the project NPTEL is to facilitate the competitiveness of Indian industry in the
global markets through improving the quality and reach of engineering education. The
operational objective of NPTEL is to make high quality learning material available to
students of engineering institutions across the country by exploiting the advances in
information and communication technology. The target group for this project consists of
students and faculty of institutions offering undergraduate engineering programmes in
India.
The National Mission on Education through Information and Communication Technology
(NME-ICT) is foreseen to influence the potential of ICT, in teaching and learning process
through content generation and connectivity. UGC-Infonet Consortia of INFLIBNET
provides numerous e-books and e-journals to higher education institutes. IIT-Bombay has
started the program of CDEEP (Centre for Distance Engineering Education Program) as
emulated classroom interaction through the use of real time interactive satellite
technology. Indira Gandhi National Open University (IGNOU) is leveraging satellite,
television, and Internet technologies to offer online courses. Private sector participation
like HP's Technology for Teaching Grant has transformed the ICT infrastructure in
institutes like Anna University and Jadavpur University. In 2007, the Distance Education
Council (DEC) allowed all allowed all premier institutes in the country to offer online
courses. Since then IIM-C, IIM-B, IIM-K, XLRI and other management institutes have
started offering courses in association with private players like Hughes, Reliance, NIIT,
etc. IIT-Kanpur has developed Brihaspati, an open source e-learning platform. An
increasing number of private players like Hughes Global Education, Manipal Education
Group, Centum Learning, UEI Global, Shiv Nadar University, etc. are offering online

15
education courses in association with leading Central and State Universities leveraging
with good ICT infrastructure. MHRD also set up Yashpal- Committee for Advise on
Renovation and Rejuvenation of Higher Education. The Committee in its 2009 report
covered issues of universities/higher education including admission of students to faculty
evaluation, research work linked to national/social concerns to networking of universities,
R&D Labs and industries. The report mentioned that the prevailing environment does not
emphasize on application work. Yashpal- Committee stresses on the importance of both
theoretical and applied learning. It recommends the use of local data and resources to make
learning from curriculum more applicable and interesting. The report also promotes the
idea of a university as a meeting place of all knowledge through inter-disciplinarily
learning. The committee stresses the importance of integrating teaching with research and
research with teaching.
ICT for Education (ICT4E) ­ the Problem zone
Considering the stress made on Knowledge network through ICT in various policies,
policy-makers and stakeholders in Higher education need to examine the challenges and
constraints of integrating ICT4E. Information is considered as the main capital for
knowledge societies wherein ICT is expected to be the catalyst in Higher Education. ICT
infrastructure alone does not fulfill the vision and policies as highlighted in policies.
ICT4E would require a shift in instructional paradigm. Castells (2000) highlights the
knowledge gap "the use of the Internet, both in school and in professional life, could
amplify the social differences rooted in class, education, gender and ethnicity". The issue
Castells mentions is that digital divide leading to knowledge gap is rising because of the
manner in which technology diffusion is taking place. "Key urban centers, globalized
activities, and the higher-educated social groups are being included in the Internet-based
global networks, while most regions and most people are switched off" (Castells, 2000).
Higher education institutes need to instill in their students not just `operationalism' but
deeper understanding of their social and cultural context. There is the fear that
understanding, insight, wisdom and critique are being supplanted by skill, outcome,
information and flexibility (cf. Barratt, 1979; Midgley, 1989). On the other hand, ICT is
associated with empowerment (D'Allesandro and Dosa, 2001), enhancing social
connectivity accessibility to education, public and government services (UNESCO, 2011;
Katz et al., 2001).

16
One of the challenges for the internal development of higher education institutions is
created by the implementation of rapidly changing information technologies. Higher
education institutions are not only contributing in knowledge advancement but are also
reliant on the information network and subject to the restrictions of ICT. Both students and
teachers need to re-assess their notion about learning and instruction. Therefore, the issues
around ICT4E are not only oriented to technology but are also towards attitude in
pedagogy and culture of the institutes. ICT in education necessitates trained support staff
to aid in pedagogy (Laurillard 2004; Hasenbegovic et al. 2006 and Tezci, E., 2011a). As
much as ICT is reconstituting the higher education scenario and its stakeholders and its
delivery mechanism, there are arguments about the role of higher education in this
juncture. A school of thought supports the notion of universities being industry oriented
(Eggleston 1994, Kohli and Health 2001, Liu and Jiang 2001, Roberts 2000, Todd Davey
et al.2011). But Williams (2000) writes that universities are already too focused on
employment and industry, which is detrimental to their teaching and research. He is
representative of a more idealistic school that argues that universities should help build
pure knowledge, social capital and the capacity for critical thinking (Aronowitz and
Giroux 1991, Conceicao et al. 2001, Freire 1972, Giroux 1983, Reffell and Whitworth
2002). Reffell and Whitworth (2002) have attributed ICT education being unsuccessful
owing to its technocratic stance and lack of local and real world problems
contextualization.
Rationalized and modernistic approach not suitable for a country can cause
disruptive tensions between local and foreign academics (Kelegai and Middleton, 2002;
World Bank, 2011). However, ICT skills are considered equally important to reading,
writing and arithmetic (Bohme, 2002). The impact of ICT in higher education can be seen
in terms of the extent to which technology use enables individuals of these institutes to
participate and be a part/ node in the networked knowledge society. As Haddon (2000)
would put it: `the extent to which ICTs enhance our abilities to fulfill active roles in
society, or being without them constitutes a barrier to that end'. Understanding the actual
functions of knowledge society requires scholars, policymakers and the public to recognize
contemporary models for deployment of knowledge and distribution of technologies.

17
Issues involved:
1. The social basis of knowledge emphasizes:
(i) Knowledge and the value of knowledge are rooted in social relations; (ii) Knowledge
surfaces as a fresh code of social classification, motility and status; (iii) Knowledge and
the circulation of knowledge is linked to political economy of government in the triple
helix dynamics of university-industry-government.
2. Communications and information technologies diminish the effect of distance
making possible `action at a distance in real time' (Peters and Besley, 2006):
(i) transmission of knowledge ­increasing speed, circulation and exchange; (ii) the
development of digital archive and digital representations of all symbolic and cultural
resources; (iii) the radical concordance of image, text and sound, and development of
new information/knowledge infrastructures; (iv) the emergence of a global media
network linked with a global communications network; (v) the emergence a global
consumer culture and the rise of global edutainment media conglomerates.
3. New geographies (`spaces') of knowledge in the international knowledge system:
(i) Investment in human capital and key competencies becomes a source of value in
knowledge-based institutions, with an emphasis on knowledge being locked into
systems or processes; (ii) `Synchronous face-to-face interactions matter for transmitting
knowledge' (Quah, 2002) so sources of innovation lie in networks of social
relationships, that is, knowledge networks (Cooke, 2002); (iii) Geographical clustering
of new economic activity; (iv)Emergence of global science networks, strategic research
collaborations, and university consortia.
4. Knowledge, freedom and development. Two powerful narratives of the modern age:
`knowledge as freedom' and `development as freedom'. Critical question concern
access, distribution and ownership: (i) Open source & open access; (ii) Free and open
public science (the intellectual commons); (iii) `Knowledge for Development' (World
Bank) vs `Development as Freedom' (Amartya Sen); (iv) Development is less like a
continuous, unbroken, linear story, separated by invariant stages and more like a non-
chronological, networked communication system based upon a layered complexity -
`free resources have been crucial to innovation and creativity' (Lessig, 2002).

18
Universities have been at the forefront to develop ICT and must be at the forefront in using
them (UNESCO, 2003):
· In access: "distance" and "virtual" institutions allow for growing numbers
of students to access higher education, in more remote areas and at any time
of day and night.
· In teaching and learning: whose efficiency, many agree, is increased by
ICTs. Courses are enriched by videos and various other multimedia devices.
Students' learning experience is considerably enhanced because they live
the situation from different view points and can compare data online.
Moreover, learning being learner-centred rather than teacher-centred (self-
tuition), they are able to match the learning they receive with their
individual learning styles, capacities and speed. Learning is based on the
capacity "to find, access and apply knowledge to problem- solving" (Salmi,
2001).
· For academic staff: with the use of educational software, teachers may be
seen as serving as guides rather than lecturers and transmitters of
knowledge. It is also believed that ICTs are a great time saver for teachers.
However, this is controversial as, even if fewer academic staff is needed,
they have to be trained to use ICTs and work with technology specialists:
more technical, specialized staff should, therefore, be hired.
· In matters of costs: although investment in equipment and in initial course
development is more costly, it is believed that teaching will eventually
become cheaper, as it will in the long run attract more students, necessitate
less administration, less teaching staff, less travel, etc.
Universities must determine what they will implement, how much, where and what
consequences they expect from the use of ICTs. Hence assessment is required to
understand educational policies towards increasing ICT connectivity for education and
towards the systematic integration of ICT. When it comes to specific policies on ICT in
education, the elements that need to be reviewed include Allocation of funds; Hardware
allotted in a cost effective manner, targeted student-computer ratios, the configuration and
placement of ICT facilities, and technical support for students and teachers; Softwares
used and Service providers; Teachers (are they first generation users?); Adaptation of
curriculum accordingly; Staff to support computers and related technology in schools;

19
Network infrastructure for teachers and students to gain access to knowledge and share
information; Infrastructure development; Interoperation of information systems;
Development of technological standards; Research and development; ICT education and
training; National ICT development coordination; International interface and cooperation;
Access to infrastructure; Access to information; Monitoring the use of ICT and
Measurement of the impact of ICT.

20
Chapter 2
Knowledge society and ICT in Education narrative
The Knowledge Society Discourse
The growing importance of knowledge, research, innovation and evolving perspectives on
expertise with the usage of Information Communication Technologies (ICT) are changing
the sociology of knowledge in the globalized world. The terminologies associated are
Knowledge Society, Knowledge Economy, Information Society, Learning Society,
Network society. Nico Stehr mentions that Knowledge Society was first used by Lane
(1966), as the ``great optimism of the early 1960s which suggests that science would
somehow allow for the possibility of a society in which common sense would be replaced
by scientific reasoning'' (Stehr 1994). Drucker (1969), cites knowledge ``as the foundation
of economy and social action''. Robin Mansell and Stehr further developed this concept in
the 1990s. Knorr Cetina (1997, 2001) considers knowledge society as one in which the
culture of knowledge permeates to the society as a whole and not one in which production
and flow of knowledge is limited to a few privileged. Machlup (1962) defines knowledge
as the ability to apply human intellect in drawing meaning from various information
sources. Peters (2007) mentions the dispute in terminologies and ideologies associated
(Knowledge Society by sociologists, Knowledge Economy by economists and Learning
Society by educators) taking place in the policy regimes. The terms `Information society'
and `post industrial society' appeared with the works of Bell (1973), Machlup (1962),
Portat (1977) and Rubin et al. (1986). Castells (1998, 2000, 2001), Melody (1987), Melody
and Mansell (1986), Mosco and Wasko (1988), Stehr (1992, 2002), Sussman (1999) and
Webster (2002a, 2002b) have contributed to the ideation of information or global
knowledge society have further developed this concept in the context of sociology and
political economy.
Knowledge and change in society are connected to Learning Society and Knowledge
Economy. Knowledge in this case is applicable to all spheres of societies with very less
distinction between formal and non-formal education (Hutchins 1968; Huse´n 1974;
Mansell, 2012; UNESCO, 2013). Lifelong learning for advancing one's career by learning
how to learn becomes a requisite. Learning is not the privilege of an elite class anymore
(UNESCO, 2013). Machlup (1962) traced the economic essence of knowledge production

21
to 1960s. In his consolidated structure of knowledge industry he subscribed to education as
the most important sector. Knowledge industries are identified in the field of education,
research and development, communication media, information machines and services. The
officially received view on the knowledge economy ­ the view that emanates from the
world policy institutions like the World Bank, International Monetary Fund (IMF) and
OECD ­ tends to support the shift to a global knowledge economy.
Knowledge Society literature reflects scattered view points and represents a still
developing field. "This is apparent in a lack of consensus on basic terminology and in fluid
and disparate research agendas reflecting for example, technological, political, economic,
social or educational perspectives on the Information Society. There are also differences
between those who would view it as representing epochal-type change and perceive the
emergence of different types of networked informational societies, and those who maintain
that there is no novel, post-industrial society and that changes in occupational structure and
related developments simply reflect continuity with the past. Moreover, for all those who
proclaim the Information Society as providing the answer to social inequality, poverty and
unemployment there are others who would regard it as likely to widen the gap between
information haves and have-nots and to maintain existing socio-economic disparities"
(Sarker, 2001; Perkman, M., et al., 2013 and Ohiagu, 2013).
Harold Adams (1951) says that communication technology drives history. "A medium of
communication has an important influence on the dissemination of knowledge ... and it
becomes necessary to study its characteristics in order to appraise its influence in its
cultural setting". He talks of communication revolution leading to "digital age" and an
"information society." Societies and cultures according to him would be influenced by the
communication processes and the associated institutions. Some pertinent questions which
arise from these discussions are:
1. Does the nature of knowledge production change societies, cultures and
economics?
2. Does the Knowledge Society confirm the existence of a knowledge community
whose members share a common stock of knowledge and more or less similar
experiences?
3. What are Communications Models for Knowledge Creation and Knowledge
Society
?

22
Higher education policies for knowledge society at work: the global level
ICT in Higher education policies of major international organizations promoting
knowledge society projects with a global scope are seen at work in United Nations (UN)
and its agencies (UNDP, UNESCO), the World Bank, OECD, the International
Association of Universities, World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS),
International Telecommunication Union (ITU). The Arab Human Development (AHDR),
several of South East Asia models and European Union's (EU) overarching strategy to
cope with the challenges of globalization reflect policies at work in the regional level. The
policy need and requirement however are contextual and region specific. The gap between
those able, and those unable, to participate in the global information society is currently
termed as the "digital divide". Unfortunately, this digital divide is evident within a country
like India as well as several other developing countries. Several documents of UNESCO
stress the important role that higher education institutions are to play in knowledge
societies, "based on radical changes in the traditional patterns of knowledge production,
diffusion and application.''
UNESCO has come up with "ICT in Education Policy" for Asia-Pacific region where the
main emphasis is to reduce the digital divide while improving the education quality at the
same time. The major trend seen in global education scenario is to shift the focus from
teacher oriented learning to student oriented learning with the use of ICT. The emphasis is
also on problem solving skills of the students where they actively control and engage in
their own learning. Knowledge construction with easy access to information is emphasized
rather than just replicating knowledge source. This has/can be facilitated with different
forms of ICT as reflected in various policy documents hence giving more choice to policy
makers. In 2003 UNDP report for the Arab World with a higher education sectors
characterized the region as knowledge consumer rather than knowledge producer. Absence
of scientific research in higher education is attributed to seclusion of these academic
institutes from the academic global community. Contextualized ICT education policy in
relation to the country's need should help in solving this issue.
Governments have linked nation's economic development with universities having
access to latest technologies (Gibbons et al. 1994, Nowotny et al. 2001; Etzkowitz et al.
2000 and ITU, 2011). Gibbons et al. (1994) talks of new Mode 2 form of knowledge
production replacing the traditional one, Mode 1. Mode 1 knowledge is academic

23
discipline oriented, Mode 2 knowledge is application oriented. It is interdisciplinary and
more socially relevant. Etzkowitz and Leydesdorff (2000) further mention the ``Triple
Helix'' of university, government and industry where academic, economic and wider
networks of social actors together constitute the triple helix knowledge dynamics.
Etzkowitz et al. (2000) mentions that transformation in production, exchange and use of
knowledge will result from internal changes in academia, state and industry. The
enterprising university can lead to economic development together with scientific research
and education (Etzkowitz 2002 in Tuunainen, 2005; Gibb, 2013, Perkman, M., et al., 2013
and Klofsten, M., 2013). Universities in the knowledge society need to become more
entrepreneurial. However, due to the emphasis on operationalism, learning terms such as
understanding, insight, wisdom and critique are being replaced by skill, outcome,
information and flexibility (Midgley, 1989; Clark, 1998; Etzkowitz et al.2012; Mevlin,
2012 and Fayolle, 2013). The challenges faced by higher education institutions in this
light are:
1. Traditional academic university versus commercialization and academic capitalism
(Slaughter and Rhoades, 2004; Bourdieu, 2004; Ylijoki, 2003; Marginson, 2006;
Mevlin, 2012 and
EUA, 2013). Academic cultures in different disciplines varies in
terms of their social applicability (Becher and Trowler, 2001; Slaughter and
Rhoades 2004; EC, 2013; Fayolle, 2013). What possibilities are available to higher
education to shape society's own sense of worthwhile knowledge, as well as
responding to the messages that come its way?
2. Does higher education with the modern technological networking have the ability
to call forth particular modes of thinking and acting in the society in which it
operates? Do the cognitive requirements stemming from these higher education
institutes contribute to the development of a more rational society?
Universities have to address the issue of academic accountability to its various
stakeholders which includes academics and governments, industry, professional
associations, students etc. This would mean not just incorporating the technical
requirements of new circumstances but seeing its relevant utility in the social and cultural
context. Today's knowledge society requires its learners to have the 21
st
century skills.
According to Partnership for 21st Century Skills, "People in the 21st century live in a
technology and media-suffused environment, marked by various characteristics, including:
1) access to an abundance of information, 2) rapid changes in technology tools, and 3) the

24
ability to collaborate and make individual contributions on an unprecedented scale. To be
effective in the 21st century, citizens and workers must be able to exhibit a range of
functional and critical thinking skills related to information, media and technology"
(Partnership for 21st Century Skills,2009).
Giddens in 1990 talked about individuals networking in greater information milieu
constructed by specialized people and later using that information in their local context.
Castells traces network society to the 1980s where global society was restructured to create
network society through the use of ICT. "In the new, informational mode of development
the source of productivity lies in the technology of knowledge generation, information
processing, and symbol communication" (Castells, 1996). Castells and Himanen (2001)
consider networks the social structure of information age. Castells considers networks as
"open structures, able to expand without limits, integrating new nodes as long as they are
able to communicate with the network, namely as long as they share the same
communication codes". According to Castells, a network-based social system is a "highly
dynamic, open system, susceptible to innovation without threatening its balance''. It is in
this context that Mansell (2012) stressed on ICT as being pivotal in the growth of
Knowledge Society. ICT is considered an empowering tool (D'Allesandro and Dosa, 2001;
UNESCO,2013), it can lead to wider social dealings and engagement enabling enhanced
access to education and its subsequent networks of public and government facilities as well
as facilitate easy and widespread access to education and other public and government
services. (Katz et al., 2001; Servon and Nelson, 2001; Neil, 2012).
Based on the above discussion, the subsequent paragraphs discuss the higher education
scenario in different regions.
Southeast Asia region: The "ICT in Education" policies of countries in the Southeast Asia
region vary greatly. While some have not yet formulated any specific visions or plans,
others are at an advanced stage of ICT integration. Following the global trend, Southeast
Asian countries are geared towards deployment of in ICT higher education. (SEAMEO,
2010) gives a report of status of ICT integration in education in Southeast Asian Countries
based on these different stages of development. The countries are categorized into three
groups.

25
Group 1 countries are Brunei Darussalam, Malaysia, and Singapore. These
countries are at the infusing and transforming stages for most of the dimensions of
ICT in education. In this group, Malaysia and Singapore are well-ahead on the ICT
in education journey than Brunei, especially in the dimensions of teaching and
learning pedagogies and community/partnership.
Group 2 countries are Indonesia, Philippines, Thailand, and Vietnam. They are
mainly at the infusing stage for most of the dimensions and most of them already
have developed ICT plans and policies in education. But due to the rural-urban gap
and different levels of access to ICT infrastructure, there are still some parts of the
dimensions that are in the applying and even emerging stage. Among the countries
in this group, Thailand and Vietnam are in more advanced stages of ICT in
education than Indonesia and Philippines.
Group 3 countries are Cambodia, Lao PDR, Myanmar, and Timor Leste. Although
each of these four countries has either started to develop and implement ICT in
education plans and policies or implemented ICT in education projects on a small
scale, all of them are still at the emerging stage for most of the dimensions. The
main concern of these countries is access to ICT infrastructure, hardware and
software. In this group, Cambodia and Myanmar are at more advanced stages of
ICT in education than Lao PDR and Timor Leste.
Arab Human Development Reports: The social movements that arose in 2011 in the
Arab States have demonstrated the potential of ICT to play a catalytic role. Arab Spring
ranks among the most significant informal ICT-assisted "learning" phenomena in 2011,
whereby thousands of youth used social media ­ accessed via their mobile phones ­ as a
space for self-identification, self-assertion, contestation and mobilisation around
democracy, human rights and civil liberties (UNESCO, 2012). Arab Human Development
Report (AHDR, 2003) states the five pillars that could support the building of an Arab
knowledge society:
1. Guaranteeing the key freedoms of opinion, speech and assembly through good
governance bounded by the law. [...] 2. Disseminating high quality education for all.
[...] 3. Embedding and ingraining science, and building and broadening the capacity
for research and development in all societal activities. [...] 4. Shifting rapidly
towards knowledge-based production in Arab socioeconomic structures. [...]
5. Developing an authentic, broadminded and enlightened Arab knowledge model.

26
To fill the gap of absence of scientific research in higher education, Qatar and the United
Arab Emirates are initiating the development of R&D sectors in higher education. Qatar
Foundation for Education, Science and Community Development, Qatar has Education City,
the Qatar Science and Technology Park (QSTP) and theQatar National Research Fund
(QNRF). United Arab Emirates in creating free zones such as Knowledge Village in Dubaito
link academia to industry. Major investment in ICT has been made in this regard. The Arab
Knowledge Report 2010/2011 proceeds to the stage of laying the foundations for the
knowledge society by developing principles of dealing with the methodologies and
mechanisms of preparing future generations to actively participate in building the knowledge
society and access its vast domains. The report covers the processes of preparing and
rehabilitating Arab citizens to enhance their skills; instilling values which control and direct
their decisions and activities, and the methods and mechanisms of their empowerment.
These maximize the opportunities of their active participation in building the knowledge
society and reaping its benefits.
Europe: In European higher education, one of the most interesting processes related to
knowledge society discourse is the Bologna Process. It seeks to build European Higher
Education Area (EHEA) on the basis of international cooperation and academic exchange.
The Bologna Process is named after the Bologna Declaration, which was signed in 1999 by
ministers in charge of higher education from 29 European countries. The envisaged
European Higher Education Area will facilitate mobility of students, graduates and higher
education staff; prepare students for their future careers and for life as active citizens in
democratic societies, and support their personal development; offer broad access to high-
quality higher education, based on democratic principles and academic freedom. Work is
also undertaken in areas of broader societal relevance, such as the links between higher
education, research and innovation; equitable participation and lifelong learning (Bologna,
2009).
The network services to research and education is organized in three levels viz. the Local
Access Network to which the user is connected, the national infrastructure provided by the
national research and education network and the pan-European level network. DANTE
(Delivery of Advanced Network Technology to Europe Ltd.) organizes, manages and
provides international advanced data network services for the research community.
TERENA (the Trans-European Research and Education Networking Association) takes care

27
of fostering new initiatives; supporting joint work in evaluating, testing and integrating new
technologies; organizing conferences and workshops for information dissemination, and
representing the common interests and opinions of its membership. These levels of operation
in European ICT network have proved to be very successful. In ICT related educational
innovation, European higher education institutes functions on collaboration by creating
structural and functional relationships.
Africa: The Association of African Universities emphasizes on development and application
of ICT in higher to bridge the digital and economic gap. Associations of African
Universities, Inter-University Council for East Africa, and partnerships with foreign
universities assist in the development of ICT policies in African universities. Established
universities further take up the leadership role in implementing national ICT policies. South
African National Research Network (SANReN) comprises of all universities and technical
universities reaching more than 600,000 users facilitates international collaboration for the
data analysis. SANReN has dedicated connectivity to GEANT-the European network via
the satellite. This along with submarine cable SAFE connectivity will ensure South Africa's
connectivity to over 3000 research institutions world-wide. Africa's higher education is
benefitting from the ICT enabled networking and collaboration with other foreign
universities. Agence Universitaire de la Francophonie (AUF) and Partnership for Higher
Education in Africa have provided networking with France, Canada, US and some other
countries. The objective of these tie-ups is to use ICT to enable all-inclusive modernization
and growth of universities. Development Partnerships in Higher Education programme
(DELPHE) initiated by the UK Department for International Development (DFID) is another
such endeavor. Three Rwandan universities (the National University, the Kigali Institute for
Education, and the Kigali Institute for Science and Technology) and the University of
Nairobi have partnered with Google to improve access to Web-based communications for
staff and students (infoDev, 2007).
Higher education policies for knowledge society at work: the national level
India's education policies at work for knowledge society have been covered in the preceding
chapter. The following section discusses national scenarios in some countries where ICT
initiatives in the context of globalization have brought about changes in the higher education
sector.

28
USA: The US Government has initiated adoption of market based policies in its higher
education sector in order to make universities more efficient and effective. ICT has
enabled cross border academic programmes for both conventional universities and internet
based distance learning providers. Specific educational policies are developed by each
state; however the emphasis on 21st century skill set is seen in the education scenario. ICT
focus now is on the processes and major investments are in the area of digital curriculum
and instruction. Importance is also given on providing flexibility to learners with the use of
ICT. Funding is the main component of US ICT R&D ecosystem. Andersen and Coffey
(2011) in U.S. ICT R&D Policy Report stated that "Networking and Information
Technology R&D Program (NITRD) is the primary vehicle for the coordination of U.S.
federal investment in ICT research. While the NITRD program's funding has increased in
recent years, the problem is that much of the funding dedicated to ICT research is not
actually being used for ICT research". On the networking front National Lambda Rail
(NLR) owned and managed by a consortium of US universities and private companies has
been providing greater autonomy over research projects of the universities.
UK: British government is committed to a `knowledge economy'; there is heavy
investment on ICT infrastructure and support in the higher education sector. The stress is
also laid on virtual and lifelong learning system facilitated by ICT. Universities are trying
to incorporate flexibly of learning for its students. Dearing Report (1997) made
recommendations for training and staff development, quality assurance arrangements, the
challenges of ICT, institutional management and governance for the British higher
education sector as a `Learning Society'. Laurillard (2002) mentions that Dearing Report
emphasizes on individual personal development; importance of teaching and research in
knowledge society; and the cultural and political value of higher education all of which
points at the importance of relevance of higher education in society . White Paper The
Future of Higher Education (2003), National Professional Standards Framework (2006)
developed by the Higher Education Academy are other policy documents designed to
bring out major changes in British higher education sector to widen education and to meet
the skills requirement of global knowledge economy. (Saunders & Klemming, 2003;
Garland & Noyes, 2004; Ertmer and Otternbreit, 2010; Tezci, E., 2011a) cover ICT in
pedagogy instances where they have been used to facilitate greater flexibility in teaching
and learning process by either aiding the traditional face to face learning or by bringing
about change in methodology by supporting part time learners. ICT resources have also

29
been used in individual academic departments and for building consortia. Kaul in 2006
stated that "The mainstay of the British Universities today are their 270,000 foreign
students (not including EU) who pay an international fee which is substantially higher than
that of local students and collectively contribute $1.8 billion a year in fees...The market
for foreign students is considered to be worth £30 billion in fees alone. Further, this market
is expected to grow exponentially as incomes in developing countries increase. Within the
next 15 years, the demand for seats by foreign students will treble from 2 million to about
5-8 million in 2020, with most of the demand coming from Asia. Today, Britain ranks next
to the US in popularity". Gibbs (2001) covers Learning and Teaching report published by
higher education institutions in England. The study showed 48% of institutions stressed
on `development of flexible learning'; 47% targeted `improved access to learning
resources' and 81% wanted to make best use of ICT as pedagogical tool.
Australia: Australia's approach of emphasis on Vocational Education and Training (VET)
in higher education has led to an influx of foreign students. In order to expand their reach,
Australian universities have also tied up with countries in Asia and Gulf to establish their
campuses in these countries. Australian Vice- Chancellors Committee and Australian
National Training Authority (ANTA) have developed credit transfer arrangement in
different fields of study. VET sector had 1.9 million students in 2012. Commonwealth has
sanctioned $1.8 billion in 2013-14 for VET sector through National Agreement for Skills
and Workforce Development and supporting national partnerships (Australian
Government, 2013). The Australian Council for Educational Research (ACER) has laid the
emphasis for ICT development to enhance research along with the guidelines laid by the
National Assessment Program. Australian Curriculum integrates ICT to increase access,
knowledge building and communication. The emphasis is also on using ICT for problem
solving skills and collaborative learning with relevance to society in the local and global
context. The Melbourne Declaration on the Educational Goals for Young Australians
(MCEETYA, 2008) states that "in a digital age, and with rapid and continuing changes in
the ways that people share, use, develop and communicate with ICT, young people need to
be highly skilled in its use. To participate in a knowledge-based economy and to be
empowered within a technologically sophisticated society now and into the future, students
need the knowledge, skills and confidence to make ICT work for them at school, at home,
at work and in their communities".

30
China: In response to global trend, China has also come up with several Schools of
learning in higher education especially in the field of sciences to attract foreign students.
Various foreign universities have also set up their campuses in China. China has also
placed emphasis on distance and virtual learning through the use of ICT to bridge the gap
in education and access to information. Chinese Central Radio and TV University
(CCRTVU) in collaboration with the regional universities has come up with video lessons
for the students and also provides distance training for teachers in distance mode. Over
80,000 hours of TV courses have been prepared in consultation with subject specialists.
"China's satellite TV education programme planned to cover 70 per cent of the country
with educational TV stations or relay stations" (Sanyal, 2001). China was facing the
challenges to achieve the objective of 9 year compulsory education for the entire country
because of inaccessibility in certain regions and ethnic diversity (Chen Xiangming, 2000).
However ICT has enabled education to reach majority of its population. The "Twelfth
Five-year Plan" period (2010-2015), the Chinese government laid special emphasis on
incorporating ICT to build the next generation of information infrastructure.
Singapore: In Asia, Singapore has evolved as an educational hub for higher education
attracting students from over 60 nationalities. In order to create a knowledge based society,
Singapore places emphasis on international collaboration in education and industry
linkage. This has been possible with the presence of over 7000 multinational companies
which enables students to have industry experience and the existence of Private tertiary
educational organisations (PEO). For quality assurance Singapore has set up a `Care Trust'
awarding and Singapore Quality Clan (SQC) benchmarks. National University of
Singapore (NUS), Nanyang Technological University (NTU) and Singapore Management
University (SMU) have developed into centres of excellence. 14 of the world's leading
international universities including University of Chicago, Graduate School of Business
and INSEAD have set up centres of excellence in education and research in Singapore
(Kaul, 2006). Ministry of Education, Singapore has come up with its third Masterplan for
ICT in Education (2009-2014). The first Master plan was laid in 1997. The strategies of
the third Masterplan for ICT in Education are "to strengthen integration of ICT into
curriculum, pedagogy and assessment to enhance learning and develop competencies for
the 21st century; to provide differentiated professional development that is more practice-
based and models how ICT can be effectively used to help students learn better and to to
improve the sharing of best practices and successful innovations" (MOE Singapore, 2008).

31
Information Communication Technology (ICT) Interface
The above discussions show that ICT integration in Education is considered indispensable
in the approach to be taken by universities and government policies if they are to develop a
Knowledge based society. ICT developments will result in cost effective, efficient
transmission, retrieval and analysis of information. Quah (2002) claims that knowledge in
the global economy is used as both an input and an output; "Digital goods are bitstrings,
sequences of 0s and 1s, that have economic value. They are distinguished from other
goods by five characteristics: digital goods are nonrival, infinitely expansible, discrete,
aspatial, and recombinant". ICT offers the tools for active participation in the society
adding to Marshall McLuhan's global village. On a similar line, Castells (2001) discusses
how global civil society, government regulation, and economic development can be
influenced by information technologies. Harold Adams (1951) discusses that ICTs signify
an interface of mind and matter. Hence changes they create in communication
environments would lead to changes in "collective mentalité"; bringing about unavoidable
changes in society and culture.
Heeks (2002) lays emphasis on `iDevelopment not eDevelopment' using ICT and has
come up with various suggestions for policy building. (Gundrey, Murphy and Rao ,1993;
Rubinyi 1989 and Neil Butcher, 2012) talk about internet facilitating a wider interactive
communication and network which can impact individuals/organizations. World Summit
on the Information Society (WSIS, 2013) states the issue of exploiting the full potential
ICT to bring access and support sustainable development. The types of knowledge activity
taken up by universities have been described as one in which epistemic tradition in specific
disciplines continues and another which is interdisciplinary and more relevant to the
industry. Some scholars believe that with current ICTs, the later type of knowledge can be
applied where required. This has led to the emergence of entrepreneurial model of
academic research which can influence the economic growth of society (Etzkowitz, 2002
ibid; Etzkowitz et al.2012; EUA, 2013; EC,2013; Gibb, 2013 and Klofsten, 2013).
(Stoll, 1995; Talbott, 1995) along with other scholars have commented on ICT being over
hyped. Researches show that indiscriminate uses of ICT do not lead to knowledge
societies. (Melody, 2006, 1996c) commented that often time ICTs are based on corporate
needs; interventions in telecom policies is vital. Knowledge society development is unique

32
to each country where telecom facility system and ICT services according to Melody play
the crucial role. ICT enable educational change and improve the quality of education; they
prepare individual for the global economy and knowledge society (Kozma & Wagner,
2005; Sarkar, 2102 and UNESCO, 2012) thereby impact the education sector and economy
of a nation. Hence their linkage to national policies is necessary to address the constraints
faced in developing countries (Oliver et al, 2001; Sibiya, 2003; Perkman, et al. 2013 and
Klofsten, 2013). Kaino (2004) and Shan Fu (2013) highlight ineffective ICT policies
leading to underutilization.
Jaffer et al.(2007), Balasubramaniam et al.(2009), Ward, L. and Parr, J. M. ( 2010)
mention how ICT is also used for scholarly community engagement, and administration in
higher education. Universities are subject to the limitations of ICT one such challenge is
updating to the latest technological advances. Other challenges are in terms of pedagogical
thinking and organizational structures (Laurillard 2004; Tezci, E., 2011a). Advancements
in ICT call for trained professionals in both its technical and pedagogical units. ICT is
changing the way universities function and is crucial for "tackling the impacts of
massification, diversification, internationalisation and marketisation in higher education"
(International Association of Universities, 1998; Thune & Welle-Strand, 2005; Ward, L. &
Parr, J. M., 2010). It cannot be detached from educational, administrative and logistic
concerns; ICT needs to be implemented in institutional policy documents.
ICT for education and Institutional policies
Paisley (1985), mentions the first revolution in information technologies brought by films,
radio, television and satellite broadcasting; and the second revolution brought by
telecommunications and microcomputers. The third revolution brought by integration of
telecommunications and microelectronic technology in computing has enabled an
individual to interact in a network of worldwide electronic community (Papagiannis et al,
1987). The fourth revolution has the term `globalization' associated with it. Globalization
is ascribed to bring about interconnectedness through international exchange and
transnational interaction, dissolve economic borders and make the world a single global
society (McGrew, 1992; Faulconbridge and Beaverstock, 2009 and GWCRG, 2013). The
impact of ICT in higher education can be seen in terms of the extent to which technology
use enables individuals of these institutes to participate and be a part/ node in the

33
networked knowledge society. As (Haddon, 2000) puts it: "the extent to which ICTs
enhance our abilities to fulfill active roles in society, or being without them constitutes a
barrier to that end". Policies need to look at current patterns in information usage and ICTs
used in this process. Studies conducted have proved that just a mere increase in
infrastructure does not entail for successful deployment of ICT.
Kozma (2008) discusses how policy makers have recognized potential of ICTs to
restructure organizations, advance collaboration, increase democratic participation and
enhance the social integration of individuals with different abilities and groups of different
cultural background. Current trends are seen in ICT enhanced collaborative learning and
knowledge building (Shan Fu, 2013). Kennedy (2001) states that ICT shifts education
from just elite learning to mass learning as it provides greater accessibility. Inspite of its
potential, the high rate of failures result from poor ICT implementation (Haslinda et. al,
2013). Chatterje et al. (2002) emphasize that for ICT to be successful, it has to assimilate
in an organization wherein ICT diffuses across organizational work processes and becomes
a regular and essential part in the activities associated with those processes.
Roger's Diffusion of Innovation theory tries to explain assimilation of ICT in an
institution in three stages: initiation stage, assimilation stage and post-adoption stage
(Rogers, 2003). (Tornatzky & Fleischer, 1990) came up with TOE framework where
technology, organization and environment variables affect ICT assimilation in an
organization. Scott (2007) discusses the importance of technically capable ICT staff in an
organization who can adapt with the users' requirements and also the technological and
environmental needs. Organizational culture and change process according to Scott further
affect the assimilation process. Orlikowski (1991) came up with the Structuration Theory
of Technology Assimilation which gives interpretive flexibility. It looks at the relationship
between humans and technology and the context in which technology is developed and
used. Technology assimilation will depend on technology, human agent, and institutional
properties. Human agents create and use technology; and technology causes the human
agents to change their routine practices. Both act as mediators in the ongoing process
(Orlikowski, 1992). Web Assimilation model developed by Chatterjee et al (2002), top
management championship, strategic investment rationale, and extent of coordination
effect the assimilation of technologies. Clark et al (2008) discusses that since ICT
assimilation involves different actors, there is a need for shared value for the new
innovation.

34
ICT implementation requires infrastructure and human resources; technology has to be
user friendly; and an organization requires support staff to guide the users in skills to
implement Internet-related applications (Kevin, 2006; Matthews, 2007; Gao, J., & Hargis,
J., 2010). The emphasis laid here is on ICT human resource termed as `translators' (Paul
and Berranger, 2002). They are the link between the users and the technology; they
increase the organization's learning capability. (Kling, 1980; Markus and Robey, 1988;
Haslinda et. al, 2013) objected the overemphasis on technology and technocrats driven
changes in ICT adoption; they stressed the need to focus on the process driven changes
brought about by technology. And this process involves various social actors (Robey and
Bourdreau, 1999). Orlikowski (1992; 2000) mentions how such changes brought about by
ICT challenge existing cultures, structures and power relations in an organization.
Different contexts and different users assign varying meanings to ICT and its change
process (Orlikowski, 1992; Linderoth, 2007 and Haslinda et. al, 2013). Hence often time
there is a difference in interpretation of ICT from its assigners, developers and users
(Ciborra 1996; Hanseth & Braa 1998; Haslinda et. al, 2013 and Hanaa, 2014).
On the basis of above discussions the following questions arise in the context of ICT
implementation in higher education towards the larger goal of knowledge society:
1. Can higher education institutions become a more prominent and integrated part of
the knowledge society? How do the higher education policies affect the
communication process in a knowledge society?
2. What would be the demands from the knowledge economy for changes in the
organization of higher education and the way knowledge is managed within the an
institution? How can research and other knowledge be harnessed more efficiently
and how can ICT help in establishing a scientific knowledge base in these
activities?
3. Does exposure to profusion of Information using ICT change the way knowledge is
being created? Do virtual sharing systems enable a new or different kind of
knowledge system?
4. How are we to understand the knowledge mission of the university? If knowledge
is produced universally across the knowledge society, what characterizes the
knowledge activities of the university?

35
5. Networking in higher education - where does a network begin or end? Where do
networks become visible? Where or does the network branch out unofficially to
form `critical discussion within societies'?
6. Are the students in the Universities actually using ICT to fulfill the plans laid by
the education policies? What are the conditions that facilitate knowledge creation?
7. How can knowledge be effectively transferred using ICT? What are the inhibitions
towards knowledge acquired from internet sources? What about the issue of Digital
Divide within these educational networks?
8. What are the role of on line learning and distance education in the Universities?
9. How do individual higher education institutions participate in the discourse about
the knowledge society. What are the salient issues that the higher education in
different regional context (e.g. Northeast India) is likely to face in the near future?

36
Chapter 3
Methodology and Research Approaches for analyzing ICT integration
Case Study Research
The epistemology which guides this research is Interpretive Case Study which is suitable
for studying information systems in organizations. Interpretive studies help in analyzing
the phenomena by focusing on meanings constructed by people through the context of
information system and evidence sources viz. documents, archival records, interviews,
direct observation, participant observation, physical artifacts (Walsham, 1993; Yin, 2002).
(Jones and Nandhakumar (1993); Orlikowski and Baroudi (1991) and several other
researchers had applied interpretive case study analysis in studying the use of technology
in organizations. ICT can be considered socio-technical because it involves people and
their institutional structure. Interpretivism in this case is a suitable research approach to
study how social reality is constructed through assigning meanings to actions. Orlikowski
and Baroudi (1991) studied 155 articles on information systems and highlighted three main
research methodologies: positivist, interpretative and critical. The authors divide each of
the three research perspective into:
1. Ontology: Beliefs about Physical and Social Reality
2. Epistemology and methodology: Beliefs about Knowledge
3. How the researcher relates to the subject under study: Beliefs about
Knowledge Beliefs about the Relationship between Knowledge and the
Empirical World
Theoretical approaches: the social and technical
Technological determinism and Social determinism are theories seen as two extreme
forms. In the former view, technological systems are regarded primarily as technical
wherein problems regarding technology are technically complex and can be solved by
using sophisticated technical solutions. Technological determinism is often guided by
autonomy of technology and importance of technical constraints (Constant, 1989;
Hickman, 1990; Ropohl, 1983; Wilkinson, 1964; Winner, 1977). Technology becomes a
distinct system with its relationship to society expressed in terms of impacts (Chandler,
1995). Hales and Snyder (1981) come up with the terms "input, processes, output, and

37
feedback" indicating a linear direction that technology takes. Technological determinism
has been criticized for its limited perspective in ascribing an autonomous character to
technology. In the latter view, technological systems are believed to be social systems that
are technically implemented; "They serve as the agent for significant social interactions,
which implies their connection to human communication through the medium of
language" (Hirschheim, Klein et al. 1995). Social constructivists highlight "relevant social
groups" and "interpretive flexibility"; technology represents a social construction and
`social shaping' of the actors involved (Brey, 1997). This approach has also been criticized
for its shallow emphasis on political and social interests.
Socio-technical approaches: The socio-technical perspective is a balance between the
above mentioned two approaches. It sees technology reliant on both social factors and the
technical qualities of technology itself (Markus and Robey, 1998). Markus and Robey
mention an interactive approach where use of technology depends both on human choice
and technological characteristics. This perspective of understanding technology represents
both social and technical aspect comprising of heterogonous networks of human and non-
human actors (Avgerou, 2002; Law, 1992).
Both the technical and social perspective are influential. The diffusion theory (which can
be considered as a socio-technical approach) and the actor-network theory (which can be
the social construction of technology) will be followed in this research. Hence, the
research approach is interpretive and case study is the appropriate method for this research.
Diffusion theory, Actor- Network theory and Grounded Theory as a theoretical
framework for analysis
Diffusion theory: Everett Rogers' work `Diffusion of Innovations' (Rogers, 1995) states
that diffusion is a process through which an individual passes while adapting to a new
technology. It has five stages viz. knowledge, persuasion, decision, implementation, and
confirmation. This theory works methodologically as analysis of the five stages explains
the adoption or non-adoption of an innovation. Various studies and extension of Diffusion
theory have come up with factors such as innovation characteristics, organizational
characteristics, characteristics of the environment and characteristics of the communication
channel and networks which could affect the adoption process.

38
Diffus
techno
individ
comm
limitat
This th
to fact
the en
could
gain d
Actor-
human
other a
on the
interco
resour
in ethn
1988).
(Adapt
sion theory
ological inn
duals and o
munity- and
tion, diffusio
heory is use
tors such as
nvironment
affect the a
eeper under
-network t
n and non-h
actors into t
se actors (L
onnections
rces required
nography w
. The main t
F
ted from Has
has been
novation is
organization
population-
on theory is
ed as a start
innovation
and charac
adoption pro
rstanding an
theory: Act
human actor
their world a
Latour, 1996
built up by
d to bring th
which is relev
translation f
Figure 1 - A
ssard, Law, &
criticized f
positive a
ns, rather th
-level dynam
s still helpfu
ing point of
characteris
cteristics of
ocess were t
nd to move b
tor-network
rs (Callon 1
and how the
6). Law and
y technolog
hese projects
vant in stud
followed in A
ANT Key C
& Lee, 1999;
for having
and for cha
han on sys
mics (Drazi
ul to investig
f analysis in
stics, organiz
f the comm
tested. Then
beyond an o
k theory (AN
1986; Law
ey bestow q
Callon (198
gists as the
s to fruition
dying Inform
ANT resear
Concepts an
; Callon, 199
a strong bi
arging the
stems or sit
in and Scho
gate the adop
n the researc
zational cha
munication c
n actor-netw
operational p
NT) follow
1992). ANT
qualities, de
88) states "O
ey propose
n." ANT app
mation syste
rch are given
d Translatio
91, 1999; Lat
ias towards
poor adop
tuations. It
oonhoven,
ption proces
ch where qu
aracteristics,
channel and
work theory
perceptive o
s networks
T examines
sires, vision
Our object, t
projects an
plies qualitat
ems (Suchm
n in the follo
on Moments
tour, 1987 by
s assuming
ption on ad
does not l
1996). Desp
ss of techno
uestions per
, characteris
d networks
y is further u
of assessmen
made up o
how actors
ns and motiv
then, is to tr
and then se
ative approac
man, 1987; Z
owing figur
s
y Jo Rhodes,
that a
dopting
look at
pite its
ologies.
rtaining
stics of
which
used to
nt.
of both
s enlist
vations
race the
eek the
ches as
Zuboff,
re.
, 2009)

39
Michel Callon (1986) summarized the process of "translation" as four moments or phases
viz. Problematization, Interessement, Enrolment and Mobilization. To be able to follow
ANT methodology the research gathers the following information (Callon, 1986):
1. Identify and describe the purpose, needs, and benefits of ICT
(problematization).
2. Develop a list of key actants (actor-networks or stakeholders) and
define their interests, needs, and requirements.
3. Map relationships of actants and identify centrality of relationships,
strong and weak ties, structural holes, and sources of resistance.
4. Engagement of the key actants and translation of their interests into
visions, objectives, plans and roles (interessment).
5. Map Enrolment, mobilization, empowerment, and coordination of
actants as translators, i.e., creating chains of translators, and dealing
with resistance.
6. Devise strategies for expansion and continuance of the network, e.g., for
creating centers of translation for expanding and perpetuating the
network and effecting the desired change.
Radder (1992) cites the limitations of ANT for focusing only on case studies and empirical
observation; values and norms may be overlooked. Walsham (1997) further states that
following ANT may lack political analysis and result in poor explanations. To remedy this,
further exploration into the concept of translation with the help of Grounded Theory is
required. Translation calls for an interpretive approach to study the socio-technical nature
of ideas and behaviour.
Grounded Theory: Grounded Theory (Glaser & Strauss, 1967) data analysis involves
searching out the concepts looking for codes, concepts and categories. Grounded Theory is
"an inductive, theory discovery methodology that allows the researcher to develop a
theoretical account of the general features of a topic while simultaneously grounding the
account in empirical observations or data" (Martin and Turner; 1986). The three
characteristics of grounded theory--inductive, contextual, and processual; it attempts to
come up with a a context-based, process-oriented description of the phenomenon
(Orlikowski and Baroudi, 1991). Grounded theory leads from codes to concepts to
categories to theory and helps in investigating the connections at each stage. Based on the

40
codes, concepts and categories gathered at different stages of the research, questionnaires
were formulated and data gathered was interpreted during analysis.
The theoretical framework of DOI and ANT act as sensitizing device (Glasser & Strauss,
1967; Glasser,1978) in the first stage of analyzing which will take the form of `open
coding' (Strauss, 1987). Diffusion theory helps in locating the links between cause and
effect; ANT approach helps the research in locating how actor-networks (people and
things) are created, strengthened and weakened. ANT offers some key terms that emerge
from empirical investigations, but the theory is designed to dissolve once the descriptive
phase of field work is over. Therefore techniques from Grounded Theory are adapted in
order to conduct data analysis (Glaser & Strauss, 1967). ANT and Grounded Theory are
complementary theories, firstly because they both place empirically grounded data
collection at the heart of research and secondly because they are designed to sensitize the
researcher to different aspects of field work process. Grounded Theory does not offer the
researcher a philosophical basis upon which to conceptualize empirical work but it does
offer clear guidelines for data analysis; ANT offers no such guidelines but is well suited to
the task of theoretically sensitizing the researcher.
Selection of Institutes for the Case Study
India's higher education system is the third largest in the world, after China and the United
States. Central Government is responsible for major policy relating to higher education in
the country. It provides grants to University Grants Commission (UGC) and establishes
central universities in the country. There are 39 Central Universities under the purview of
the Ministry of Human Resource Development, created under the Act of Parliament. Out
of them 15 new Central Universities have been established w.e.f 15.1.2009. The ordinance
has since been replaced by an Act of parliament, namely, Central Universities Act, 2009.
While 38 of these are getting maintenance and development grants by the Central
Government through the UGC; IGNOU, New Delhi is funded directly by the Ministry of
HRD.

41
List of 15 new Central Universities:
1.
University of Bihar
2.
University of Gujarat
3.
Central University of Haryana
4.
University of Himachal Pradesh
5.
University of Jammu & Kashmir
6.
University of Jharkhand
7.
University of Karnataka
8.
University of Kerala
9.
University of Orissa
10.
University of Punjab
11.
University of Rajasthan
12.
University of Tamil Nadu
13.
Guru Ghasidas Vishwavidyalaya, Bilaspur
14.
Dr Harisingh Gour Vishwavidyalaya, Sagar
15.
Hemwati Nandan Bahuguna Garhwal University, Srinagar
Affiliating Universities
1.
Rajiv Gandhi University , Itanagar
2.
Assam University, Silchar
3.
The Indira Gandhi National Tribal University, Amarkantak
4.
Central Agricultural University, Imphal
5.
Manipur University, Imphal
6.
North Eastern Hill University, Shillong
7.
Mizoram University, Aizawal
8.
Nagaland University, Nagaland
9.
Pondicherry University, Pondicherry
10.
Sikkim University, Gangtok
11.
Tripura University, Agartala
12.
Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh
13.
University of Allahabad, Allahabad
14.
Babasaheb Bhimrao Ambedkar University, Lucknow
15.
Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi
16.
Delhi University, Delhi

42
Non-affiliating unitary Central Universities:
1. University of Hyderabad, Hyderabad, became central university 1974.
2. Maulana Azad National Urdu University, Hyderabad, became central university
1998.
3. The English and Foreign Languages University, Hyderabad, became central
university 2007.
4. Tezpur University, Tezpur, became central university 1994.
5. Mahatma Gandhi Antarrashtriya Hindi Vishwavidyalay, Wardha, became
central university 1997.
6. Vishwa Bharati University, Shanti Niketan, became a central university in
1951.
7. Jamia Mallia Islamia University, New Delhi, became central university 1988.
8. Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, became a central university in 1969.
Out of the 39 Central universities, for the purpose of selection of cases, the 15 new
universities and 16 affiliating universities were eliminated. That left 8 Non-affiliating
unitary Central Universities which can be categorized as under:
1. Younger Central Universities: Tezpur University (1994), Mahatma Gandhi
Antarrashtriya Hindi Vishwavidyalay (1997), Maulana Azad National Urdu
University (1998), The English and Foreign Languages University (2007).
2. Older Central Universities : Vishwa Bharati University (1951), Jawaharlal Nehru
University (1969), University of Hyderabad (1974), Jamia Mallia Islamia
University (1988).
Taking the above classifications into consideration, Tezpur University and University of
Hyderabad are chosen for the purpose of case study. They are chosen on the following
basis:
1. To see the level of ICT for education (ICT4E) translation and interpretation made
by a young university like Tezpur University (TZU) and the ICT4E translation by
an older university like University of Hyderabad (UOH)
2. To look at the regional issues and challenges faced by TZU which is situated in a
remote location in Northeast of India and to assess the issues and challenges faced
by UOH which is located in a metropolis Hyderabad known for its IT and IT
Enabled Services

43
Research Design
Based on the Problem discussed in the Introductory chapter, the research attempts to
analyze issues of Knowledge, Governance and Access using ICT; the application of
communication technologies in Higher Education Sector that helps in fulfilling the goal of
Knowledge Society; the Communication process and strategies in Higher Education
networking; existing `digital divide' and the implications.
The Research objectives are:
1. An assessment of existing application of ICT in higher education institutions in
order to give an indication of the existing gap, if any.
2. Appropriateness of ICT to achieve the functions and goals highlighted in National
Knowledge Commission (NKC) in particular to increase the efficiency of
education delivery and adequate response to the new learning paradigm.
3. Adequacy of the ICT for research and development in the light of globalization.
Steps to be taken to ensure that Universities can perform the roles expected of them
in ICT innovations. Necessity for institutional ICT policy, plans and strategies for
implementation.
4. Recommendations for successful use of ICT4E management involving human
resources, processes and institutional culture from the experiences gathered from
the case studies.

44
Case Study Protocol
Table 1 - Case Study Protocol: Levels of decision and choices
Level of Decision
Choice
Epistemological and Ontological
Assumptions
Interpretive
Research Strategy
Descriptive-exploratory case study
Research Techniques
Observations, semi-structured interviews,
interpretation of documents, Questionnaires
Organisation
University of Hyderbad (UOH)
Tezpur University (TZU)
Sub-units of Analysis
National and Institutional Education Policy
documents about ICT
Administrative Information System
Institutional (Users) perspective
Timeline (field work)
August 2010 ­ March 2012
Subject
Translation of ICT4E in TZU & UOH
Theoretical framework
Diffusion Theory
Actor Network Theory
Grounded Theory
Table 2 - Unit of analysis and data sources
Unit of analysis
Description
Data Source
Objectives of University
efforts
Motivation for ICT
integration
·
Institutional policy
documents
Capital Infrastructure
Status of Servers,
bandwidth, ICT systems,
networks as well as working
conditions for students and
staff
·
Interviews of
Administrative and middle
management
·
Audits and Observation
Usage (and reasons
therefore)
Who uses facilities, for what
purposes, where and when?
Motivators and hindrances?
·
Survey of the
University Staff and Students

Details

Pages
Type of Edition
Erstausgabe
Year
2015
ISBN (PDF)
9783960675396
ISBN (Softcover)
9783960670391
File size
4.5 MB
Language
English
Institution / College
University of Hyderabad – Communications Department, SN School
Publication date
2016 (April)
Grade
PhD
Keywords
Information Communication Technologies Knowledge Education initiative National education policy ICT4E University of Hyderabad Tezpur University Case study Indian Education Policy Education in India
Previous

Title: Translation of ICT for Education towards a Knowledge Society
book preview page numper 1
book preview page numper 2
book preview page numper 3
book preview page numper 4
book preview page numper 5
book preview page numper 6
book preview page numper 7
book preview page numper 8
book preview page numper 9
book preview page numper 10
book preview page numper 11
book preview page numper 12
book preview page numper 13
book preview page numper 14
book preview page numper 15
book preview page numper 16
book preview page numper 17
book preview page numper 18
book preview page numper 19
book preview page numper 20
book preview page numper 21
book preview page numper 22
book preview page numper 23
book preview page numper 24
book preview page numper 25
book preview page numper 26
book preview page numper 27
book preview page numper 28
book preview page numper 29
book preview page numper 30
book preview page numper 31
book preview page numper 32
book preview page numper 33
book preview page numper 34
book preview page numper 35
book preview page numper 36
book preview page numper 37
book preview page numper 38
book preview page numper 39
book preview page numper 40
250 pages
Cookie-Einstellungen